RL101 Social-Justice Project
Peer Evaluation of Presentation
Last update: 09 October 2009

Delivery & Format
 N  Y 1. The presentation clearly stated the authors' names. If yes, SPECIFY.
 N  Y 2. The presenters spoke clearly and distinctly. If not, EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 3. Each member of the group was actively involved in the presentation. If not, EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 4. The presentation kept my interest. If not, EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 5. The presenters used appropriate audio and visual aids for conveying their ideas in a memorable way. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 6. The presenters cited appropriate evidence to support their claims, and presented those citations in the correct format (i.e., Biblical citation format for primary texts, and CMS-style format for secondary literature), including requisite abbreviations & punctuation. If not, EXPLAIN.
Content: The presentation clearly ...
 N  Y 7. Identified the social-justice concern that was the focus of this project. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 8. Included ample background information about this social-justice concern and how it affects specific individuals/groups in the Cleveland metropolitan area (including demographic statistics). EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 9. Discussed the way this social-justice concern is addressed by the specific placement(s) where the presenters conducted their project, including demographic statistics for their client population(s). EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 10. Suggested creative alternatives for addressing this social-justice concern in the Cleveland metropolitan area, including strategies that could be initiated by JCU students or in which they could become involved. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 11. Gave a firm theological grounding for this social-justice project. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y

12. Drew explicit connections between this social-justice concern and at least one of the religious traditions we have studied this semester. EXPLAIN.

 
 N  Y 13. Exlored the theological implications of this social-justice project in such way that it challenged my previous understanding of religion and what it involves in terms of life "in the real world." EXPLAIN.
Summative Evaluation
14. Overall, I would assign this presentation a grade of:    A         B         C         D         F
15. My rationale for this grade is:
16. Other comments? Please write them on the back of this page.
 Y  N 17. Everyone in my group did their fair share of work toward this presentation. If not, use the back of this page to EXPLAIN.
18. On the back of this page, evaluate your own contributions and those of each of your partners in turn. Clearly specify what proportion of the grade you would assign to each group member (e.g., 25%, 5%, 20%, 50%), including yourself. In at least one sentence for each person, give clear reasons justifying why the grade should be divided this way. NB: The combined %TOTAL for all the group members must equal 100%.