Grading Protocol
2
May 20062
May 2006| Agrees with negotiated choice? | No | Yes | Comment: |
| Submitted on or before due date? | No | Yes | Comment: |
| Adjustments to grade? | No | Yes | If "yes," how much? |
Organization |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Introduction | ||||||
| Thesis Statement | ||||||
| Proper Paragraphing | ||||||
| Sentence Structure | ||||||
| Conclusion | ||||||
| Subtotal |
||||||
Format |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Bibliography | ||||||
| Citations | ||||||
| Orthography | ||||||
| Punctuation | ||||||
| Typography | ||||||
| Subtotal |
||||||
Content/Clarity |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Definitions of terms | ||||||
| Logical Progression of Argument | ||||||
| Depth of Development of Argument | ||||||
| Breadth of Evidence (from the canonical gospels and extra-canonical sources, if desired) | ||||||
| Completeness of Evidence | ||||||
| Subtotal |
||||||
Interest/Accuracy |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Confrontation of Objections to Thesis | ||||||
| Focus on Jesus' Historical Words & Deeds | ||||||
| Interaction with Course Ideas | ||||||
| New Ideas or New Use of Old Ideas | ||||||
| Succinct Presentation | ||||||
| Subtotal |
||||||
| Total for Part B |
|
|
Less any adjustments from Part A |
||
Total Score for Paper |
= A B C D F |