RL101 Applied Spirituality Praxis
Peer Evaluation of Presentation
Last update: 27 November 2006

Delivery
 N  Y 1. The presentation kept my interest.
 N  Y 2. The presenters spoke clearly and distinctly.
 N  Y 3. The presentation clearly stated the authors' names. If yes, SPECIFY:
 N  Y 4. The presenters used appropriate illustrations for conveying their ideas in a memorable way. EXPLAIN.
Content: The presentation clearly ...
 N  Y 5. Identified the spiritual praxis that was the focus of this project. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 6. Stated the initial hypothesis regarding this "experiment in spirituality." EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 7. Identified how the experimental design was supposed to test this hypothesis. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 8. Evaluated to what extent the hypothesis was proven/disproven. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 9. Included ample background information about this spiritual praxis, including how, where, and why it developed. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 10. Gave a firm theological grounding for this spiritual praxis and drew clear connections between it and at least one of the religious traditions we have studied this semester. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 11. Explained how this spiritual praxis is taught/learned though the specific placement(s) where the presenters conducted their project. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 12. Suggested creative ways in which this spiritual praxis might benefit JCU students and how they could be introduced to it. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 13. Explained the presenters' change in understanding of "holiness" over the course of this project, and discussed how this praxis helped them become more "holy" persons. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 14. Exlored the theological underpinnings of this spiritual praxis in such way that it challenged my previous understanding of how religion can be practiced and what effect this can have on daily life. EXPLAIN.

Overall, I would assign this presentation a grade of  A  B  C  D  F because:
 Y  N Everyone in my group did their fair share of work toward this presentation. If not, EXPLAIN.
On the back of this page, evaluate each of your partners in turn; clearly specify what proportion of the grade you would assign to each (e.g., 25%, 5%, 50%), and justify why you would divide the grade this way. NB: The TOTAL for all group members combined will equal 100%.