| At the outset of this course, you were asked to define religion, give an example of a religious experience, and clarify what criteria you were using to determine that this experience qualifies as "religious." You have been exposed to many facets of human religion during this course, and many ways of analyzing and evaluating them. In light of all you gained from this course, return to your first essay and re-work it to make a coherent synthesis of the new information you have learned. | ||||||
| Story | ||||||
| 1. Using the terms symbol, myth, ritual, and culture, re-tell the story of the "religious experience" you described in your first essay. | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Subtotal |
/15 |
|||||
| Comments: | ||||||
| Criteria | ||||||
| 2. In light of all we have studied, what criteria do you now think should be used to evaluate whether an experience is ÒreligiousÓ or not? Why? (NB: If the criteria remain unchanged, this part earns a zero.) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Subtotal |
/15 |
|||||
| Comments: | ||||||
| Justifying Changes in Criteria | ||||||
| 3. How have your criteria for classifying something as a "religion" or a "religious experience" changed as a result of this course? Why? (NB: If the criteria remain unchanged, this part earns a zero.) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
||||||
|
||||||
Subtotal |
/10 |
|||||
| Comments: | ||||||
| Evaluation of Experience | ||||||
| 4. In what ways does this event meet your new criteria for a "religious experience," and in what ways does it not? (NB: If the criteria remain unchanged, this part earns a zero.) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| a. Logical exposition, following coherent sequence | ||||||
| b. Point-by-point evaluation of how experience fits criteria | ||||||
Subtotal |
/10 |
|||||
| Comments: | ||||||
| Definition of Religion | ||||||
| 5. Using the concepts of creed, code, cult, and community, what is the best definition for "religion" that you can generate? Justify your definition on the basis of clarity, utility, specificity, and inclusivity. Nothing that is not "religion" should be includable under your definition, while everything that really is "religion" should fit with it. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Subtotal |
/30 |
|||||
| Comments: | ||||||
| Formal Characteristics | ||||||
| The essay is composed in succinct, formal prose in standard American English. It is completely free of grammatical, syntactical, orthographic, or other scribnerÕs errors. It correctly follows the Chicago Manual of Style conventions for quotations, footnotes, and other references. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Clear and succinct formal prose | ||||||
| Correct grammar, syntax, spelling, etc. | ||||||
| Lucid organization, proper paragraphing, etc. | ||||||
| References correctly follow CMS conventions | ||||||
Subtotal |
/20 |
|||||
| Comments: | ||||||