RL101 Social-Justice Project
Peer Evaluation of Presentation
Last update: 27 November 2006

Authors' names:

 

 
 N  Y 1. The presentation clearly stated the social-justice concern that was the focus of this project. If yes, specify:
 N  Y 2. The presentation included ample background information about this social-justice concern and how it affects specific individuals/groups in the Cleveland metropolitan area (including demographic statistics).
Explain:
 N  Y 3. The presentation discussed the way this social-justice concern is addressed by the specific placement(s) where the presenters conducted their project, including demographic statistics for their client population(s).
Explain:
 N  Y 4. The presentation suggested creative alternatives for addressing this social-justice concern in the Cleveland metropolitan area, including strategies that could be initiated by JCU students or in which they could become involved.
Explain:
 N  Y 5. The presentation gave a firm theological grounding for this social-justice project.
Explain:
 N  Y 6. The presentation drew clear connections between this social-justice concern and at least one of the religious traditions we have studied this semester.
Explain:
 N  Y 7. The theological implications of this social-justice project challenged my previous understanding of religion and what it involves in terms of life "in the real world."
Explain:
 N  Y 8. The illustrations in this presentation were appropriate for conveying the ideas in a memorable way. Comments?
 N  Y

9. The presenters spoke clearly and distinctly. Comments?

 
 N  Y 10. The presentation kept my interest.
Explain:
Overall, I would assign this presentation a grade of  A  B  C  D  F because:
 Y  N Everyone in my group did their fair share of work toward this presentation. If not, explain:
On the back of this page, evaluate each of your partners in turn; clearly specify what proportion of the grade you would assign to each and why.