Annotated Bibliography
Grading Protocol
12 December 2007
Preliminaries |
| Basics
(worth two points each) | Yes
| No
| Score |
|
1. Print version of the assignment was submitted on or before due date.
|
|
| |
| 2. Digital copy (DOC, WPD, ODX, or HTML) was submitted along with print copy.
|
|
| |
|
3. Header includes the reviewer's name and date of compilation.
|
|
| |
|
4. Print-out is single-spaced within entries, but double-spaced between them.
|
|
| |
|
5. Abstracts fit assigned word limits.
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /10 |
| Format
(worth ten points each) |
|
| |
| 1. Bibliographic references are complete and accurate.
|
|
| |
| 2. Bibliographic references correctly follow The Chicago Manual
of Style.
|
|
| |
| 3. Abstracts are written in clear, direct, inclusive, and formal English. |
|
| |
| 4. Abstracts are free of grammatical, punctuation, spelling, and
syntactical errors.
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /40
|
Abstracts |
| Entry 1 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 2 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 3 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 4 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 5 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 6 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 7 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 8 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 9 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entry 10 |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /05 |
| Entries 11+ |
| 4 points
| Clear, succinct, and accurate synopsis of the article/chapter/book (structure, thesis, key terms)
|
|
| |
| 1 point
| Brief evaluation of the contributions and limitations of the piece for understanding the topic
|
|
| |
| Sub-total
| /xx |
| TOTAL POINTS
| /100 |
| less points for late submission |
– |
| FINAL SCORE |
|