Compare & Contrast Assignment
Grading Protocol
07 April 2008
Part One: References
- The complete and accurate Chicago Manual of
Style version bibliographic references for the original sources should
be listed at the top of the first page of the analysis, followed by the
your name and the date the review was written.
- The document should be compiled in html or xml
format and submitted electronically to the course web or via email to the
instructor.
- If the review is submitted in print form, the document
should have a two-line header that appears on the top left of each page,
with the your name on the first line and the references for the texts you
are analyzing on the second line; page numbers should appear at the top
right of each page of the analysis.
|
| |
3 |
Bibliographic reference is complete; correctly follows Chicago
Manual of Style; reviewer's information is complete; html file submitted
electronically |
| |
2 |
Bibliographic reference is complete; correctly follows Chicago
Manual of Style; reviewer's information is complete; doc or wpd file (with
correct header and page enumeration) submitted electronically |
| |
1 |
Bibliographic reference is complete; correctly follows Chicago
Manual of Style; reviewer's information is complete; doc or wpd file (with
correct header and page enumeration) submitted in print form |
| |
0 |
Bibliographic reference is incomplete or does not correctly follow
Chicago Manual of Style; or reviewer's information is incomplete; or
doc or wpd file (with incorrect or no header and page enumeration) submitted
in print form |
Part Two: Content
|
| |
3 |
Accurate identification of the key features of the Biblical texts
you are analyzing (genre, form, structure, etc.) |
| |
Given the features of the four sources to the Pentateuch (for
the OT analyses) or Synoptic Gospels (for the NT analyses): |
| |
3 |
a. |
Which do you find in each of your texts? |
| |
3 |
b. |
Where do you find each of them? |
| |
3 |
c. |
In each case, what textual features contributed to your identification? |
| |
3 |
d. |
If there are places where sources are layered upon each other, with one or
more later sources building on one or more earlier ones, where do you see those
changes and how do they affect the content/meaning of the text? |
| |
3 |
What historical and theological significance do you see in the
multiplicity of sources behind your texts? |
| |
3 |
What historical and theological significance do you draw from
the fact that the core tradition is repeated in the Bible? |
Part Three: Evaluation of this Exercise
- What is the most important thing you learned by doing this analysis?
- What are two or three questions you would like to raise for class discussion
of these texts?
|
| |
3 |
Clear, succinct, complete, and interesting response to Q1 and
2–3 good questions for class discussion |
| |
2 |
Adequate response to Q1 and 1–2 good questions for class
discussion |
| |
1 |
Vague response to Q1 and 1–2 insubstantial questions for
class discussion |
| |
0 |
No response to either of these questions |
Composition: Grammar,
punctuation, spelling, etc. |
| |
3 |
Perfect work |
| |
2 |
One or two punctuation mistakes OR one spelling or grammatical
or syntactical error |
| |
1 |
Three or more punctuation mistakes OR two spelling or grammatical
or syntactical errors |
| |
0 |
Three or more spelling or grammatical errors OR several punctuation
mistakes and one or two spelling or grammatical or syntactical errors |
| |
Total Points (of 30) |
| – |
less points for late submission |
| |
Net Points |