RL205 Research Project Peer Evaluation of Presentation 09 May 2008
Date:
Name of Evaluator:
Delivery
N
Y
1. The presentation kept my interest.
N
Y
2. The presenters spoke clearly and distinctly.
N
Y
3. The presentation clearly stated the authors' names. If yes, SPECIFY:
N
Y
4. The presenters used appropriate illustrations for conveying their ideas
in a memorable way. EXPLAIN.
Content: The presentation clearly ...
N
Y
5. Identified the contemporary question that was the starting point
for this project. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
6. Identified a variety of NT resources that pertain to this contemporary
question. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
7. Took a clear stance on the contemporary question.
EXPLAIN.
N
Y
8. Gave
a clear, firm theological grounding for this this stance in the life
and teachings of Jesus as well as other resources in the NT. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
9. Confronted possible
Biblical objections to the stance being advocated. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
10. Dealt responsibly with the NT texts in confronting possible
objections to the stance being advocated. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
11. Connected the stance with Jesus' understanding of soteria and the Kingdom of God. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
12. Exlored the theological underpinnings of this contemporary
question in such way that it challenged my previous understanding of how
religion (especially Christianity) can be practiced and what effect this
can have on "real" life. EXPLAIN.
N
Y
13. The most interesting/helpful concept I learned from this
presentation was ...
N
Y
14. The least interesting/helpful/clear aspect of this presentation
was ...
Overall, I would assign this presentation a grade of
A B C D F because:
Other comments?
Y
N
Everyone in my group did their fair share of work toward this presentation.
If not, EXPLAIN.
On the back of this page, evaluate your partner(s); clearly specify what proportion of the grade you would
assign to each one, including yourself (e.g., 25%, 5%, 50%), and justify why you would divide the
grade this way. The TOTAL for all group members combined must equal
100%.
09 May 2008