OT Social-Justice Project
Peer Evaluation of Presentation
Last update: 27 November 2006

Delivery
 N  Y 1. The presentation kept my interest.
 N  Y 2. The presenters spoke clearly and distinctly.
 N  Y 3. The presentation clearly stated the authors' names. If yes, SPECIFY.
 N  Y 4. The presenters used appropriate illustrations for conveying their ideas in a memorable way. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 5. All citations of Biblical passages conformed to the standard format, including abbreviations & punctuation. If no, EXPLAIN.
Content: The presentation clearly ...
 N  Y 6. Identified the social-justice concern that was the focus of this project. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 7. Included ample background information about this social-justice concern and how it affects specific individuals/groups in the Cleveland metropolitan area (including demographic statistics). EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 8. Discussed the way this social-justice concern is addressed by the specific placement(s) where the presenters conducted their project, including demographic statistics for their client population(s). EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 9. Suggested creative alternatives for addressing this social-justice concern in the Cleveland metropolitan area, including strategies that could be initiated by JCU students or in which they could become involved. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y 10. Gave a firm theological grounding for this social-justice project. EXPLAIN.
 N  Y

11. Drew explicit connections between this social-justice concern and the OT traditions, especially those concerning the Covenant. EXPLAIN.

 
 N  Y 12. Exlored the theological implications of this social-justice project in such way that it challenged my previous understanding of Biblical teaching and/or what is required of those who follow the God of Israel. EXPLAIN.
Overall, I would assign this presentation a grade of  A  B  C  D  F because:
 Y  N Everyone in my group did their fair share of work toward this presentation. If not, EXPLAIN.
On the back of this page, evaluate each of your partners in turn; clearly specify what proportion of the grade you would assign to each (e.g., 25%, 5%, 50%), and justify why you would divide the grade this way. NB: The TOTAL for all group members combined will equal 100%.