Peer Evaluation Protocol
27
March 2007
| N | Y | 1. This Critique clearly stated which passages from the undisputed letters of Paul provided the basis for the study. |
| If yes, specify: | ||
| N | Y | 2. All citations of Biblical passages conformed to the standard format, including abbreviations & punctuation. |
| If not, explain: | ||
| N | Y | 3. This Critique drew creative (and plausible) connections between at least one key theme of Paul's "gospel" and the film. |
| Comments? | ||
| N | Y | 4. The theological analysis was persuasive, given what we have learned about Paul's first-century Jewish historical, cultural, and socio-political context. |
| Explain: | ||
| N | Y | 5. The analysis of this film helped me to understand this film in a deeper way than I had before. (If this film was unfamiliar, then indicate whether the analysis has helped you understand some other film that you have seen recently or remember well.) |
| Explain: | ||
| N | Y | 6. The theological implications of the selected scenes from the film were clearly explained. |
| Comments? | ||
| N | Y | 7. The theological implications of the selected scenes from the film challenged my previous understanding of Christianity, and/or of Paul's "gospel." |
| Explain: | ||
| N | Y | 8. The film clips or other A-V materials were appropriate for conveying the presenter's points in a memorable way. |
| Comments? | ||
| N | Y | 9. The presenter spoke clearly and distinctly. |
| Comments? | ||
| N | Y | 10. The presentation kept my interest. |
| Explain: | ||
| Overall, I would assign this Critique a grade of
A
B
C
D
F because: |
||
| I would assign my Critique a grade of
A
B
C
D
F because: |
||