Synoptic Gospel Storyboard
Peer Evaluation Protocol
Last page update:09 May 2008
 N  Y 1. This Storyboard clearly stated the authors' names.
If yes, specify:  
 N  Y 2. This Storyboard clearly stated which Gospel passages provided the basis for the study.
If yes, specify:  
 N  Y 3. All citations of Biblical passages conformed to the standard format, including abbreviations & punctuation.
If not, explain:  
 N  Y 4. This Storyboard presented creative alternatives to the Biblical accounts of this scene.
Comments?  
 N  Y 5. The alternative scenarios were plausible, given what we have learned about Jesus of Nazareth's first-century Palestinian historical, cultural, and socio-political context.
Explain:  
 N  Y 6. The different scenarios in this Storyboard helped me to see Jesus differently than I had before.
Explain:  
 N  Y 7. The theological implications of the various scenarios were clearly explained.
Comments?  
 N  Y 8. The theological implications of the various scenarios challenged my previous understanding.
Explain:  
 N  Y 9. The Storyboard illustrations were appropriate for conveying the presenters' points in a memorable way.
Comments?  
 N  Y 10. The presenters spoke clearly and distinctly.
Comments?  
 N  Y 11. The presentation kept my interest.
Explain:  
Overall, I would assign this presentation a grade of  A        B        C        D        F because:

Other comments?

 Y  N Everyone in my group did their fair share of work toward this presentation. If not, EXPLAIN.
On the back of this page, evaluate your partner(s); clearly specify what proportion of the grade you would assign to each one, including yourself (e.g., 25%, 5%, 50%), and justify why you would divide the grade this way. The TOTAL for all group members combined must equal 100%.