Religion D3: Mackie - An Inconsistency


Directions: Read to the bottom (scrolling
if necessary); then click "forward =>."


J.L. Mackie was one of the major philosophical opponents of religion in the twentieth century. Here Mackie claims that theism is logically inconsistent (and thus irrational) in combining these three judgments:
    1. God is omnipotent.
    2. God is wholly good.
    3. Evil exists.
If God were omnipotent, he could prevent every evil. If he were wholly good, he'd prevent every evil that he could prevent. So if God were omnipotent and wholly good, he'd prevent every evil -- so there'd be no evil.

This exercise deals with a reading from Mackie in our anthology (pages 263-73 of Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings (second edition), edited by Peterson, Hasker, Reichenbach, and Basinger). These computerized exercise materials are copyrighted (c) 2002 by Harry J. Gensler; but they may be distributed freely.

menu | forward =>
This set has 9 problems.