RELIGIOUS PRAXIS: ETHICS & MORALITY

Terminology:
Two Poles of Moral Reasoning:
  1. external a set of beliefs/stories/wisdom of a tradition -- e.g., varna, asrama, dharma system (caste, life stage, duty) of Hinduism; the "decorum" (li) of Confucianism; the debarim (Ten Commandments) of Judaism and Christianity; the "Precepts of the Church" for Roman Catholics
  2. internal direct, "unmediated" religious experience (i.e., the quality of the experience, not the expression of it) -- e.g., bodhi as the basis for all behavior in Buddhism, the enlightenment experience as leading to the imperative of love for all beings, the experience of selflessness as leading to compassion; Paul's "law of the Spirit of life" which is written on the heart (Rom 2:12-29; 8)
BUT, these are not opposed to one another. They are two poles of a dialectic; thus, both are essential to moral decisions and both are present in moral action. Cf., Paul's notion of conscience (in 1 Cor), that one must have full conviction in order to be engaging in moral action; Jewish rabbinic notion of intention (kavanah) as necessary for carrying out the Law.
Questions:
  1. What is the ultimate value (to you)?
  2. What are the key values which derive from it? Or: What do you worry about most?
  3. What are the sources for ethical decision-making? i.e., where do "oughts" arise? e.g., Reason, Experience, Scripture, Tradition, Church, Community?
  4. How should one apply these values/ethics? This question concerns morality; morality "operates at the intersection of the person and the world" (e.g., Bernardin's "Seamless Garment" argument spells out specific moral behaviors based on his overall standpoint of "A Consistent Ethic of Human Life.")