Interpretive Methods for the Life of Jesus
- Dogmatism
- Naive historicism
- Bultmann's "de-mythologization" (and, for him, an existentialist re-mythologization)
- Charlesworth's interplay of archaeological and literary data
- Crossan's "triple triadic" method
1. Data generation
- cross-cultural social anthropology (ancient & modern)
- Greco-Roman & Hellenistic history
- literature concerning Jesus
2. Textual problem of the Jesus tradition
- inventory
- chronological stratification
- level of independent attestation
3. Manipulation of inventory
- sequence of strata (earliest to latest)
- hierarchy of attestation (date & number)
- bracketing of singularity
- Sanders' historical reconstruction -- the search for the Sitz im leben Jesu (matching
content & context)
Discussion:
- Which of these models do you think is best? Why?
- How should we apply these models?
- How stringent should we be in applying the criteria for historicity?
9:10 Short written response:
- What is the most valuable thing you learned in this session?
- What exercise was the most helpful in learning and/or integrating the material?
- What is one question you have concerning this material/topic?
- Which of these criteria do you see as the most important to an historical reconstruction
of the life of Jesus?
- What is your sketch of the life of Jesus?
- How do you know it? (sources & reliability)
- How does this sketch fit (or not fit) with the criteria outlined in the lecture?