Soft rationalism could see the traditional arguments for the existence of God as
Soft rationalism could see the traditional arguments for the existence of God as
This is fideism -- which soft rationalism rejects.
Soft rationalism could see the traditional arguments for the existence of God as
The teleological or cosmological arguments, for example, might not strictly prove that there is a God. But they might show that theism gives a more plausible account of the origin of the world than does atheism -- and this counts in favor of theism. Before making a final "cumulative-case" assessment, however, we'd have to examine both views more extensively and look for further strengths and weaknesses.
Soft rationalism could see the traditional arguments for the existence of God as
This is hard rationalism -- which soft rationalism rejects.