What is your answer?

To explain why the basic physical constants happen to be in the precise narrow range of what is required for life, some suggest that there is a huge (or even infinite) number of parallel universes, each with different values for the basic physical constants, and that we are in one of the unusual universes that has produced life. Thus random factors explain the apparent order and design in the universe.

Glynn says that this "parallel universes" view is

    { 1 } - a plausible explanation for which there exists independent evidence.
    { 2 } - science fiction nonsense.
    { 3 } - certainly true.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

To explain why the basic physical constants happen to be in the precise narrow range of what is required for life, some suggest that there is a huge (or even infinite) number of parallel universes, each with different values for the basic physical constants, and that we are in one of the unusual universes that has produced life. Thus random factors explain the apparent order and design in the universe.

Glynn says that this "parallel universes" view is

He doesn't claim this.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is correct!

To explain why the basic physical constants happen to be in the precise narrow range of what is required for life, some suggest that there is a huge (or even infinite) number of parallel universes, each with different values for the basic physical constants, and that we are in one of the unusual universes that has produced life. Thus random factors explain the apparent order and design in the universe.

Glynn says that this "parallel universes" view is

    { 1 } - a plausible explanation for which there exists independent evidence.
    { 2 } - science fiction nonsense.
    { 3 } - certainly true.

Glynn emphasizes that these alternative parallel universes are unobservable and have no scientific evidence in their favor; so the idea is not part of science. Instead, it's science fiction nonsense -- and a desperate attempt to avoid the conclusion that there's a mind directing nature.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is wrong. Please try again.

To explain why the basic physical constants happen to be in the precise narrow range of what is required for life, some suggest that there is a huge (or even infinite) number of parallel universes, each with different values for the basic physical constants, and that we are in one of the unusual universes that has produced life. Thus random factors explain the apparent order and design in the universe.

Glynn says that this "parallel universes" view is

    { 1 } - a plausible explanation for which there exists independent evidence.
    { 2 } - science fiction nonsense.
    { 3 } - certainly true.

He doesn't claim this.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end