What is the best match?
Diseases, floods, and so forth
{ 1 } - Theodicy
{ 2 } - The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
{ 3 } - Moral evils
{ 4 } - Natural evils
{ 5 } - The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Diseases, floods, and so forth
{ 1 } - Theodicy
{ 2 } - The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
{ 3 } - Moral evils
{ 4 } - Natural evils
{ 5 } - The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
An explanation of why an all-good and all-powerful God would permit evil <=> Theodicy
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Diseases, floods, and so forth
{ 1 } - Theodicy
{ 2 } - The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
{ 3 } - Moral evils
{ 4 } - Natural evils
{ 5 } - The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
"There is evil" is strong evidence against "There is an all-good and all-powerful God" <=> The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Diseases, floods, and so forth
{ 1 } - Theodicy
{ 2 } - The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
{ 3 } - Moral evils
{ 4 } - Natural evils
{ 5 } - The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
Cruelty, dishonestry, hatred, and so forth <=> Moral evils
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is correct!
Diseases, floods, and so forth
{ 1 } - Theodicy
{ 2 } - The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
{ 3 } - Moral evils
{ 4 } - Natural evils
{ 5 } - The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
Diseases, floods, and so forth <=> Natural evils
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
5 is wrong. Please try again.
Diseases, floods, and so forth
{ 1 } - Theodicy
{ 2 } - The "evidential" problem-of-evil argument
{ 3 } - Moral evils
{ 4 } - Natural evils
{ 5 } - The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
"There is evil" is logically incompatible with "There is an all-good and all-powerful God" <=> The "logical" problem-of-evil argument
<= back | menu | forward =>
the end