What is your answer?

Kuebler-Ross did extensive work with dying children. Often a dying child would report being aware of dead relatives "on the other side." In every case, the person mentioned was actually dead -- although frequently the relative had just died (perhaps in another part of the hospital) but the child couldn't have known this by normal means. Kuebler-Ross attributes the children's accurate knowledge to

    { 1 } - a result of oxygen deprivation.
    { 2 } - a strange coincidence.
    { 3 } - factors that go beyond normal scientific explanation.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 3.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























1 is wrong. Please try again.

Kuebler-Ross did extensive work with dying children. Often a dying child would report being aware of dead relatives "on the other side." In every case, the person mentioned was actually dead -- although frequently the relative had just died (perhaps in another part of the hospital) but the child couldn't have known this by normal means. Kuebler-Ross attributes the children's accurate knowledge to

Oxygen deprivation won't give you accurate information about a death of a relative in another part of the hospital.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























2 is wrong. Please try again.

Kuebler-Ross did extensive work with dying children. Often a dying child would report being aware of dead relatives "on the other side." In every case, the person mentioned was actually dead -- although frequently the relative had just died (perhaps in another part of the hospital) but the child couldn't have known this by normal means. Kuebler-Ross attributes the children's accurate knowledge to

    { 1 } - a result of oxygen deprivation.
    { 2 } - a strange coincidence.
    { 3 } - factors that go beyond normal scientific explanation.

There were too many cases to regard this as a coincidence.

<= back | menu | forward =>
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























3 is correct!

Kuebler-Ross did extensive work with dying children. Often a dying child would report being aware of dead relatives "on the other side." In every case, the person mentioned was actually dead -- although frequently the relative had just died (perhaps in another part of the hospital) but the child couldn't have known this by normal means. Kuebler-Ross attributes the children's accurate knowledge to

    { 1 } - a result of oxygen deprivation.
    { 2 } - a strange coincidence.
    { 3 } - factors that go beyond normal scientific explanation.

There are many such cases, reported by a wide range of researchers. Since the cases include knowledge that is both accurate and seemingly has no scientific explanation, the cases suggest that near-death experiences are genuine.

<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

























the end