What is your answer?
Glynn claims that near-death experiences (including a knowledge of events that seemingly couldn't have been obtained by normal means) provide strong evidence for the soul and the afterlife. Badham objects that
{ 1 } - the fact that we can't currently explain these experiences shouldn't make us rush into supernaturalistic explanations.
{ 2 } - the "soul" doesn't fit well with accepted science -- which demands materialistic explanations for phenomena.
{ 3 } - if we can perceive events without using our physical eyes, why did physical eyes evolve -- and why can't the blind see without their eyes?
{ 4 } - there are questions about how disembodied souls could "see" physical objects; wouldn't we notice an out-of-body eye floating around?
{ 5 } - She gives all of these objections.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Directions: Click on a number from 1 to 5.
1 is wrong. Please try again.
Glynn claims that near-death experiences (including a knowledge of events that seemingly couldn't have been obtained by normal means) provide strong evidence for the soul and the afterlife. Badham objects that
{ 1 } - the fact that we can't currently explain these experiences shouldn't make us rush into supernaturalistic explanations.
{ 2 } - the "soul" doesn't fit well with accepted science -- which demands materialistic explanations for phenomena.
{ 3 } - if we can perceive events without using our physical eyes, why did physical eyes evolve -- and why can't the blind see without their eyes?
{ 4 } - there are questions about how disembodied souls could "see" physical objects; wouldn't we notice an out-of-body eye floating around?
{ 5 } - She gives all of these objections.
She also gives the other objections.
<= back | menu | forward =>
2 is wrong. Please try again.
Glynn claims that near-death experiences (including a knowledge of events that seemingly couldn't have been obtained by normal means) provide strong evidence for the soul and the afterlife. Badham objects that
{ 1 } - the fact that we can't currently explain these experiences shouldn't make us rush into supernaturalistic explanations.
{ 2 } - the "soul" doesn't fit well with accepted science -- which demands materialistic explanations for phenomena.
{ 3 } - if we can perceive events without using our physical eyes, why did physical eyes evolve -- and why can't the blind see without their eyes?
{ 4 } - there are questions about how disembodied souls could "see" physical objects; wouldn't we notice an out-of-body eye floating around?
{ 5 } - She gives all of these objections.
She also gives the other objections.
<= back | menu | forward =>
3 is wrong. Please try again.
Glynn claims that near-death experiences (including a knowledge of events that seemingly couldn't have been obtained by normal means) provide strong evidence for the soul and the afterlife. Badham objects that
{ 1 } - the fact that we can't currently explain these experiences shouldn't make us rush into supernaturalistic explanations.
{ 2 } - the "soul" doesn't fit well with accepted science -- which demands materialistic explanations for phenomena.
{ 3 } - if we can perceive events without using our physical eyes, why did physical eyes evolve -- and why can't the blind see without their eyes?
{ 4 } - there are questions about how disembodied souls could "see" physical objects; wouldn't we notice an out-of-body eye floating around?
{ 5 } - She gives all of these objections.
She also gives the other objections.
<= back | menu | forward =>
4 is wrong. Please try again.
Glynn claims that near-death experiences (including a knowledge of events that seemingly couldn't have been obtained by normal means) provide strong evidence for the soul and the afterlife. Badham objects that
{ 1 } - the fact that we can't currently explain these experiences shouldn't make us rush into supernaturalistic explanations.
{ 2 } - the "soul" doesn't fit well with accepted science -- which demands materialistic explanations for phenomena.
{ 3 } - if we can perceive events without using our physical eyes, why did physical eyes evolve -- and why can't the blind see without their eyes?
{ 4 } - there are questions about how disembodied souls could "see" physical objects; wouldn't we notice an out-of-body eye floating around?
{ 5 } - She gives all of these objections.
She also gives the other objections.
<= back | menu | forward =>
5 is correct!
Glynn claims that near-death experiences (including a knowledge of events that seemingly couldn't have been obtained by normal means) provide strong evidence for the soul and the afterlife. Badham objects that
{ 1 } - the fact that we can't currently explain these experiences shouldn't make us rush into supernaturalistic explanations.
{ 2 } - the "soul" doesn't fit well with accepted science -- which demands materialistic explanations for phenomena.
{ 3 } - if we can perceive events without using our physical eyes, why did physical eyes evolve -- and why can't the blind see without their eyes?
{ 4 } - there are questions about how disembodied souls could "see" physical objects; wouldn't we notice an out-of-body eye floating around?
{ 5 } - She gives all of these objections.
So she hesitates to believe in the soul and the afterlife -- even though she admits that naturalistic science can't explain near-death experiences.
<= back | menu | forward =>
Before continuing, you might try some wrong answers.
the end