Consequentialism bases our duties on consequences. This chapter focuses on two important consequentialist views: classical utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.Classical utilitarianismThese questions are about Chapter 10 of Harry Gensler's Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction (London and New York, Routledge: 1998). These materials are copyrighted (c) 1998 by Harry J. Gensler; but they may be distributed freely.
Consequentialism says that we ought to do whatever maximizes good consequences. It doesn't in itself matter what kind of thing we do. What matters is that we maximize good results.Web resources -- click below forOne popular kind of consequentialism is classical (hedonistic) utilitarianism. This view says that we ought always to do whatever maximizes the balance of pleasure over pain for everyone affected by our action. This view could be based on the golden rule, which leads us to be concerned about the happiness and misery of others. Or it could be based on God's will, self-evident truths, or our own personal feelings.
We can apply utilitarianism directly (by first estimating the likely consequences of each option and then picking the option with the best consequences) or indirectly (by applying a "rule of thumb" about what kinds of action tend to have good or bad results). Many utilitarians reject exceptionless rules. They think that any rule should be broken when it has better consequences to do so. So they see moral rules only as loose "rules of thumb."
Related sites on utilitarianism:
Utilitarianism.com
Utilitarian.org
The text of Mill's Utilitarianism
An essay on Mill (the ethics part is at the end)